rails-devel

Re: [Rails-devel] rails-package rails.ui.swing SVG revenue

[brett l. <wak...@gm...>]

On 1/19/07, Erik Vos <eri...@hc...> wrote:
>
> IMHO the package name changes (prepending 'rails.')
> is worth doing now, better than later.
> I don't care about the loss of history, as I'm sure
> that the current version is better than anything in the past.
> In any case I will make a backup copy of my current project.
>


Agreed. This is small, and our revision history isn't a major loss. I
can't really see us reverting too far back. Plus, we do have a couple
of old released versions. I think that's good enough.


> The changes to Subversion and the project structure
> clearly need more thought and can be postponed, if done at all.
>

I honestly don't see the merit. It's a big upheaval for a very minor
gain. Plus, the gain is only realized in certain cases.


> However, I leave the decision to Brett.
> One of us should do it, as only the two of us can commit code now.
> I'm prepared to do the package name changes next Sunday,
> but it's equally fine to me drop the whole issue.
>

I think we should move toward a more standard package naming structure.

I might have time this weekend to do it. If not, it can happen next weekend.

---Brett

[Rails-devel] Package rails.

[Rainer M. <rai...@we...>]

Hi,
>>
>> IMHO the package name changes (prepending 'rails.')
>> is worth doing now, better than later.
>> I don't care about the loss of history, as I'm sure
>> that the current version is better than anything in the past. In any 
>> case I will make a backup copy of my current project.
>>
> Agreed. This is small, and our revision history isn't a major loss. I
can't really see us reverting too far back. 
> Plus, we do have a couple of old released versions. I think that's good
enough.

OK, so I will go on with RailsMain and Swing on Saturday. Hopefully putting
in the disclaimer.

Re: [Rails-devel] rails-package rails.ui.swing SVG revenue

[Erik V. <eri...@hc...>]

 

> > IMHO the package name changes (prepending 'rails.')
> > is worth doing now, better than later.

<snip>

> > However, I leave the decision to Brett.
> > One of us should do it, as only the two of us can commit code now.
> > I'm prepared to do the package name changes next Sunday,
> > but it's equally fine to me drop the whole issue.
> >
 
> I might have time this weekend to do it. If not, it can 
> happen next weekend.

Brett, I haven't heard your verdict on this one,
and I'm staying away from the code until I know
if and when this will be done (by you or me).

Erik.

Re: [Rails-devel] rails-package rails.ui.swing SVG revenue

[brett l. <wak...@gm...>]

On 1/22/07, Erik Vos <eri...@hc...> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > IMHO the package name changes (prepending 'rails.')
> > > is worth doing now, better than later.
>
> <snip>
>
> > > However, I leave the decision to Brett.
> > > One of us should do it, as only the two of us can commit code now.
> > > I'm prepared to do the package name changes next Sunday,
> > > but it's equally fine to me drop the whole issue.
> > >
>
> > I might have time this weekend to do it. If not, it can
> > happen next weekend.
>
> Brett, I haven't heard your verdict on this one,
> and I'm staying away from the code until I know
> if and when this will be done (by you or me).




Sorry if I've been unclear.

Yes, it should be done.

I've tried to find time for it, but it looks like I'm not going to be able
to get to it.  So, Erik, go ahead and do it.



---Brett.

Re: [Rails-devel] rails-package rails.ui.swing SVG revenue

[Erik V. <eri...@hc...>]

OK, one of these days.
 
Erik.


  _____  

From: rai...@li...
[mailto:rai...@li...] On Behalf Of brett lentz
Sent: Monday 22 January 2007 23:42
To: Development list for Rails: an 18xx game
Subject: Re: [Rails-devel] rails-package rails.ui.swing SVG revenue




On 1/22/07, Erik Vos <eri...@hc...> wrote: 



> > IMHO the package name changes (prepending 'rails.')
> > is worth doing now, better than later.

<snip>

> > However, I leave the decision to Brett.
> > One of us should do it, as only the two of us can commit code now. 
> > I'm prepared to do the package name changes next Sunday,
> > but it's equally fine to me drop the whole issue.
> >

> I might have time this weekend to do it. If not, it can 
> happen next weekend.

Brett, I haven't heard your verdict on this one,
and I'm staying away from the code until I know
if and when this will be done (by you or me).




Sorry if I've been unclear.

Yes, it should be done.

I've tried to find time for it, but it looks like I'm not going to be able
to get to it.  So, Erik, go ahead and do it.




---Brett. 

Re: [Rails-devel] rails-package rails.ui.swing SVG revenue

[Erik V. <eri...@hc...>]

OK, I have changed the package names by prepending rails.
The ui packages are now in rails.ui.swing.
This all has been committed, so expect a bulky sync next time.
My games still work, so I hope everything will be right for all of you as
well.
 
The outcommented sources in test could not be moved, so these are still in
test.
Serves them right.
 
Erik.


  _____  

From: rai...@li...
[mailto:rai...@li...] On Behalf Of brett lentz
Sent: Monday 22 January 2007 23:42
To: Development list for Rails: an 18xx game
Subject: Re: [Rails-devel] rails-package rails.ui.swing SVG revenue




On 1/22/07, Erik Vos <eri...@hc...> wrote: 



> > IMHO the package name changes (prepending 'rails.')
> > is worth doing now, better than later.

<snip>

> > However, I leave the decision to Brett.
> > One of us should do it, as only the two of us can commit code now. 
> > I'm prepared to do the package name changes next Sunday,
> > but it's equally fine to me drop the whole issue.
> >

> I might have time this weekend to do it. If not, it can 
> happen next weekend.

Brett, I haven't heard your verdict on this one,
and I'm staying away from the code until I know
if and when this will be done (by you or me).




Sorry if I've been unclear.

Yes, it should be done.

I've tried to find time for it, but it looks like I'm not going to be able
to get to it.  So, Erik, go ahead and do it.




---Brett.