From: Michael A. <out...@gm...> - 2013-09-03 20:13:56
|
Everyone, It looks like support for multiple start packets partially exists, but is not complete. None of the existing games use it. I think that it would cleaner for 1880 to start with two start packets instead of one, since there are two stages to the start - (auction off privates, then pick foreign investors). Does this seem reasonable? Is it ok if I work on finishing the support for multiple start packets? Mike |
From: John D. G. <jd...@di...> - 2013-09-04 04:55:54
|
On 2013-09-03 13:13, Michael Alexander wrote: > It looks like support for multiple start packets partially exists, but is not complete. None of the existing games use it. I think that it would cleaner for 1880 to start with two start packets instead of one, since there are two stages to the start - (auction off privates, then pick foreign investors). Does this seem reasonable? Is it ok if I work on finishing the support for multiple start packets? Please do. I'm waiting for this (and for 2.0 to land) to resume work on 1837 (where I plan start packet 1 = privates, coal, and Sd companies, start packet 2 = KK and Ug companies). |
From: Stefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2013-09-04 13:36:50
|
Nothing to object. Two things to consider: The Round mechanism will change for Rails 2.0, but there is no promised date for this to happen, so maybe not that important. However it is easy to break the StartRound class, it happened to me and others before. So run the automated tests frequently. On 09/03/2013 10:13 PM, Michael Alexander wrote: > Everyone, > > It looks like support for multiple start packets partially exists, > but is not complete. None of the existing games use it. I think that > it would cleaner for 1880 to start with two start packets instead of > one, since there are two stages to the start - (auction off privates, > then pick foreign investors). Does this seem reasonable? Is it ok if I > work on finishing the support for multiple start packets? > > Mike > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! > Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies > and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step > tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > |
From: Michael A. <out...@gm...> - 2013-09-04 13:43:16
|
So if I'm writing something like this that is not 1880 specific, which branch should I be working in? rails 1.7.x? On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Stefan Frey <ste...@we...> wrote: > Nothing to object. Two things to consider: The Round mechanism will > change for Rails 2.0, but there is no promised date for this to happen, > so maybe not that important. However it is easy to break the StartRound > class, it happened to me and others before. So run the automated tests > frequently. > > > On 09/03/2013 10:13 PM, Michael Alexander wrote: > > Everyone, > > > > It looks like support for multiple start packets partially exists, > > but is not complete. None of the existing games use it. I think that > > it would cleaner for 1880 to start with two start packets instead of > > one, since there are two stages to the start - (auction off privates, > > then pick foreign investors). Does this seem reasonable? Is it ok if I > > work on finishing the support for multiple start packets? > > > > Mike > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! > > Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft > technologies > > and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step > > tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Rails-devel mailing list > > Rai...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! > Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies > and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step > tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > |
From: Michael A. <out...@gm...> - 2013-09-05 01:38:35
|
I have a test that's failing before I changed anything (1935_PRHasTwoExcessTrains). Does everyone else have this issue? On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Michael Alexander <out...@gm...>wrote: > So if I'm writing something like this that is not 1880 specific, which > branch should I be working in? rails 1.7.x? > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Stefan Frey <ste...@we...> wrote: > >> Nothing to object. Two things to consider: The Round mechanism will >> change for Rails 2.0, but there is no promised date for this to happen, >> so maybe not that important. However it is easy to break the StartRound >> class, it happened to me and others before. So run the automated tests >> frequently. >> >> >> On 09/03/2013 10:13 PM, Michael Alexander wrote: >> > Everyone, >> > >> > It looks like support for multiple start packets partially exists, >> > but is not complete. None of the existing games use it. I think that >> > it would cleaner for 1880 to start with two start packets instead of >> > one, since there are two stages to the start - (auction off privates, >> > then pick foreign investors). Does this seem reasonable? Is it ok if I >> > work on finishing the support for multiple start packets? >> > >> > Mike >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! >> > Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft >> technologies >> > and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step >> > tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! >> > >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Rails-devel mailing list >> > Rai...@li... >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel >> > >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! >> Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft >> technologies >> and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step >> tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! >> >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails-devel mailing list >> Rai...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel >> > > |