Menu
▾
▴
rails-devel
|
From: Erik V. <eri...@xs...> - 2010-03-09 20:08:46
|
Hi Chris, New releases are not really planned but come out when a consensus is growing that it is about time to do so. Which is why I'm copying this message to the group. I have the feeling, though, that we're close to releasing version 1.1.4 (BTW it's Brett who is doing the actual releases so far). I'm rather in low gear now, but Stefan Frey is pretty active; I'm not sure if he is near a stable point in his developments. Erik. -----Original Message----- From: Chris Fawcett [mailto:cfa...@us...] Sent: Monday 08 March 2010 15:09 To: ev...@us... Cc: cfa...@us... Subject: Next Update? Message body follows: Erik, when do you plan to release the next update? I have an 18AL game on hold pending a fix that was recently made. -- This message has been sent to you, a registered SourceForge.net user, by another site user, through the SourceForge.net site. This message has been delivered to your SourceForge.net mail alias. You may reply to this message using the "Reply" feature of your email client, or using the messaging facility of SourceForge.net at: https://sourceforge.net/sendmessage.php?touser=2635896 |
|
From: brett l. <bre...@gm...> - 2010-03-09 20:38:36
|
Stefan and I were discussing this, and I think I dropped the ball. We were trying to decide how close he was to being ready to release 1889 and do a full release, or if we needed to get the critical bug-fix out before then. I think what probably makes sense is to leave 1889 marked as not yet supported, do the release as-is, and then as soon as Stefan is done with his work, we can do another release for that. So, to be clear, these would be 1.1.4 and 1.1.5, respectively. If there are no objections or concerns, I'll get moving on this tomorrow night. ---Brett. On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Erik Vos <eri...@xs...> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > New releases are not really planned but come out when a consensus is growing > that it is about time to do so. > Which is why I'm copying this message to the group. I have the feeling, > though, that we're close to releasing version 1.1.4 (BTW it's Brett who is > doing the actual releases so far). > > I'm rather in low gear now, but Stefan Frey is pretty active; I'm not sure > if he is near a stable point in his developments. > > Erik. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Fawcett [mailto:cfa...@us...] > Sent: Monday 08 March 2010 15:09 > To: ev...@us... > Cc: cfa...@us... > Subject: Next Update? > > > Message body follows: > > Erik, when do you plan to release the next update? I have > an 18AL game on hold pending a fix that was recently made. > > -- > This message has been sent to you, a registered SourceForge.net user, > by another site user, through the SourceForge.net site. This message > has been delivered to your SourceForge.net mail alias. You may reply > to this message using the "Reply" feature of your email client, or > using the messaging facility of SourceForge.net at: > https://sourceforge.net/sendmessage.php?touser=2635896 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > |
|
From: tefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2010-03-10 10:21:13
|
Brett: in fact 1889 is (fully) supported in CVS for around a week. The only exception is that one restriction during forced share selling is not enforced by Rails, but there is a workaround (simply declare that player bankrupt and end the game). I intend to work on that in combination with the wrong bankruptcy handling in 18EU and further problems in the end-of game handling of Rails. The other new features NoMapMode and CashCorrection are working fine and are ready for release. I do not intend to add any new feature for this release, thus I am only doing (simple) bug-fixes now (most of them are related to the undo-mechanism). There is still one I would like to close (forced undo crossing round types can cause Rails to accept no further user actions.) My suggestion is a release after the coming weekend. Stefan On Tuesday 09 March 2010 21:38:10 brett lentz wrote: > Stefan and I were discussing this, and I think I dropped the ball. > > We were trying to decide how close he was to being ready to release > 1889 and do a full release, or if we needed to get the critical > bug-fix out before then. > > I think what probably makes sense is to leave 1889 marked as not yet > supported, do the release as-is, and then as soon as Stefan is done > with his work, we can do another release for that. So, to be clear, > these would be 1.1.4 and 1.1.5, respectively. > > If there are no objections or concerns, I'll get moving on this tomorrow > night. > > ---Brett. > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Erik Vos <eri...@xs...> wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > > > New releases are not really planned but come out when a consensus is > > growing that it is about time to do so. > > Which is why I'm copying this message to the group. I have the feeling, > > though, that we're close to releasing version 1.1.4 (BTW it's Brett who > > is doing the actual releases so far). > > > > I'm rather in low gear now, but Stefan Frey is pretty active; I'm not > > sure if he is near a stable point in his developments. > > > > Erik. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Fawcett [mailto:cfa...@us...] > > Sent: Monday 08 March 2010 15:09 > > To: ev...@us... > > Cc: cfa...@us... > > Subject: Next Update? > > > > > > Message body follows: > > > > Erik, when do you plan to release the next update? I have > > an 18AL game on hold pending a fix that was recently made. > > > > -- > > This message has been sent to you, a registered SourceForge.net user, > > by another site user, through the SourceForge.net site. This message > > has been delivered to your SourceForge.net mail alias. You may reply > > to this message using the "Reply" feature of your email client, or > > using the messaging facility of SourceForge.net at: > > https://sourceforge.net/sendmessage.php?touser=2635896 > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >----- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > > _______________________________________________ > > Rails-devel mailing list > > Rai...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >--- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel |
|
From: Stefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2010-03-10 10:43:08
Attachments:
patch_change_director_20100310.txt
|
Brett: Sorry I realized that connection to the bug-fix release too late: I have a backport ready since I fixed that bug. Unfortunately I did not have a working address for Chris (for the sourceforge account I even get bouncing messages). Thus I suggest a quick bug-fix release (1.1.3.1) for 1.1.3, as I would still like to check-in my remaining bug-fixes before 1.1.4. I have attached the patch file for 1.1.3. Stefan On Tuesday 09 March 2010 21:38:10 brett lentz wrote: > Stefan and I were discussing this, and I think I dropped the ball. > > We were trying to decide how close he was to being ready to release > 1889 and do a full release, or if we needed to get the critical > bug-fix out before then. > > I think what probably makes sense is to leave 1889 marked as not yet > supported, do the release as-is, and then as soon as Stefan is done > with his work, we can do another release for that. So, to be clear, > these would be 1.1.4 and 1.1.5, respectively. > > If there are no objections or concerns, I'll get moving on this tomorrow > night. > > ---Brett. > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Erik Vos <eri...@xs...> wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > > > New releases are not really planned but come out when a consensus is > > growing that it is about time to do so. > > Which is why I'm copying this message to the group. I have the feeling, > > though, that we're close to releasing version 1.1.4 (BTW it's Brett who > > is doing the actual releases so far). > >Erik Vos <eri...@xs...> > > I'm rather in low gear now, but Stefan Frey is pretty active; I'm not > > sure if he is near a stable point in his developments. > > > > Erik. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Fawcett [mailto:cfa...@us...] > > Sent: Monday 08 March 2010 15:09 > > To: ev...@us... > > Cc: cfa...@us... > > Subject: Next Update? > > > > > > Message body follows: > > > > Erik, when do you plan to release the next update? I have > > an 18AL game on hold pending a fix that was recently made. > > > > -- > > This message has been sent to you, a registered SourceForge.net user, > > by another site user, through the SourceForge.net site. This message > > has been delivered to your SourceForge.net mail alias. You may reply > > to this message using the "Reply" feature of your email client, or > > using the messaging facility of SourceForge.net at: > > https://sourceforge.net/sendmessage.php?touser=2635896 > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >----- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > > _______________________________________________ > > Rails-devel mailing list > > Rai...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >--- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel |
|
From: brett l. <bre...@gm...> - 2010-03-10 19:22:38
|
That's fine. I know you've had a backported patch to fix 1.1.3 for a while. At this point, our development shouldn't be further hijacked just for one person's game. That's not fair to our other users. I understand that encountering bugs can be frustrating, especially if they disrupt an in-progress game. We've had a patched version of 1.1.3 waiting for Chris for a couple of weeks now. If we don't have reliable contact information, that's not our fault nor is it our problem to solve. In this case, I think, Stefan, you've done an excellent job of trying to help. However, I don't think it's reasonable for anyone to expect you to hold up your development indefinitely. The bug has been fixed. We'll do the new release this coming weekend that makes it generally available. I think we can move on to other issues. :-) ---Brett. On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Stefan Frey <ste...@we...> wrote: > Brett: > Sorry I realized that connection to the bug-fix release too late: > I have a backport ready since I fixed that bug. > Unfortunately I did not have a working address for Chris (for the sourceforge > account I even get bouncing messages). > > Thus I suggest a quick bug-fix release (1.1.3.1) for 1.1.3, as I would still > like to check-in my remaining bug-fixes before 1.1.4. > > I have attached the patch file for 1.1.3. > > Stefan > > > On Tuesday 09 March 2010 21:38:10 brett lentz wrote: >> Stefan and I were discussing this, and I think I dropped the ball. >> >> We were trying to decide how close he was to being ready to release >> 1889 and do a full release, or if we needed to get the critical >> bug-fix out before then. >> >> I think what probably makes sense is to leave 1889 marked as not yet >> supported, do the release as-is, and then as soon as Stefan is done >> with his work, we can do another release for that. So, to be clear, >> these would be 1.1.4 and 1.1.5, respectively. >> >> If there are no objections or concerns, I'll get moving on this tomorrow >> night. >> >> ---Brett. >> >> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Erik Vos <eri...@xs...> wrote: >> > Hi Chris, >> > >> > New releases are not really planned but come out when a consensus is >> > growing that it is about time to do so. >> > Which is why I'm copying this message to the group. I have the feeling, >> > though, that we're close to releasing version 1.1.4 (BTW it's Brett who >> > is doing the actual releases so far). >> >Erik Vos <eri...@xs...> >> > I'm rather in low gear now, but Stefan Frey is pretty active; I'm not >> > sure if he is near a stable point in his developments. >> > >> > Erik. >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Chris Fawcett [mailto:cfa...@us...] >> > Sent: Monday 08 March 2010 15:09 >> > To: ev...@us... >> > Cc: cfa...@us... >> > Subject: Next Update? >> > >> > >> > Message body follows: >> > >> > Erik, when do you plan to release the next update? I have >> > an 18AL game on hold pending a fix that was recently made. >> > >> > -- |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X