Re: [Rails-devel] 18AL named trains

[Erik V. <eri...@hc...>]

> > > "Game" is starting to look awfully
> > > out of place
> > > in our namespace. 
> I think that's a good approach, it will help with the ultimate goal of
> phasing out the Game namespace altogether.

What's wrong with game?
 
> However, I think we could very easily keep Game around until we split
> it up into Client and Server components.

Ah OK, that's a good starting point.

I think the client will (should) need the current rails.ui, the 
static objects that I mentioned (e.g. in rails.game.objects)
and the rails.game.action (PossibleAction) packages,
and little else.

The static objects should somehow be synchronized at game start.
The action objects are the main mean of dynamic info transport between
client and server.
So it would make sense to put these in some common group.

> Erik - are you happy with 18AL's playability? I'd like to make a new
> release as soon as it's "done".

Yes, I consider it done. 
When starting with 1851, I found a bug in the start round logic,
so please await my next commit, but then it's time for a new release indeed.

Erik.