From: John A. T. <ja...@ja...> - 2008-01-01 21:58:08
|
brett lentz wrote: > Yeah, svn solves several of the problems with cvs, but it's also not > exactly what I'd consider a "modern" RCS. > > We use svn where I work as well, but I've looked at git and bzr, and > both seem to offer significantly more advantages. > > I haven't made a decision just yet on whether to jump to a new RCS. > That's a big change to everyone's workflow, so I don't want this to be > subject to only my whims. > I haven't used bzr but I have used git, and I find git only gives an advantage where you can have non-committers having their own "change branches" local to their machine. It also feels like it is just complete enough to get the job done -- now I love the command line and the unix philosophy of lots of small tools that you put together yourself to do interesting things more than most, but it still feels unpolished. So, if you want to switch, my preference would be svn. -- John A. Tamplin ja...@ja... 770/436-5387 HOME 4116 Manson Ave Smyrna, GA 30082-3723 |