Re: [Rails-devel] 18AL named trains

[brett l. <wak...@gm...>]

On Jan 1, 2008 7:00 AM, Erik Vos <eri...@hc...> wrote:
> For a start: Happy New Year to you all!
>
> > "Game" is starting to look awfully
> > out of place
> > in our namespace. Perhaps sometime in the future we should consider
> > refactoring that a little.
>
> I have thought about that too.
> Perhaps we could move the "static" objects
> (like trains, certificates, tokens, phases, maphex etc.) to a subpackage,
> e.g. rails.game.objects.
> And the Rounds to e.g. rails.game.rounds,
> leaving a mixed bag of managers, Portfolio, exceptions etc.
> in the current package.
>

I think that's a good approach, it will help with the ultimate goal of
phasing out the Game namespace altogether.

However, I think we could very easily keep Game around until we split
it up into Client and Server components.

Erik - are you happy with 18AL's playability? I'd like to make a new
release as soon as it's "done".

---Brett.