From: brett l. <wak...@gm...> - 2008-01-01 21:40:06
|
On Jan 1, 2008 8:28 AM, John A. Tamplin <ja...@ja...> wrote: > The big differences between cvs and svn are that svn commits groups of > changes atomically, change (release, etc) branches are easy to do, and > it tracks moves/renames with history. Yeah, svn solves several of the problems with cvs, but it's also not exactly what I'd consider a "modern" RCS. We use svn where I work as well, but I've looked at git and bzr, and both seem to offer significantly more advantages. I haven't made a decision just yet on whether to jump to a new RCS. That's a big change to everyone's workflow, so I don't want this to be subject to only my whims. ---Brett. |