Re: [Rails-devel] 18AL named trains

[John A. T. <ja...@ja...>]

Erik Vos wrote:
> I am not familiar with the differences.
> So far CVS looks good enough to me, but I'm
> probably unaware of what goodies we are missing.
>
> For SVN we would need an Eclipse plugin, Subclipse seems to be the way to
> go.
>   
Subclipse is not bad, but it doesn't like it when you do anything with 
the repository behind its back.  I use Eclipse + svn at work all the 
time, and simply don't use subclipse and do svn ops at the command 
line.  The only time it is a problem is when you do a refactor that 
moves files, and there I just do the Eclipse refactor, mv the file back, 
then svn mv it to where Eclipse moved it.

The big differences between cvs and svn are that svn commits groups of 
changes atomically, change (release, etc) branches are easy to do, and 
it tracks moves/renames with history.

-- 
John A. Tamplin					ja...@ja...
770/436-5387 HOME				4116 Manson Ave
                		 		Smyrna, GA  30082-3723