Re: [Rails-devel] 18AL named trains

[Erik V. <eri...@hc...>]

For a start: Happy New Year to you all!

> "Game" is starting to look awfully 
> out of place
> in our namespace. Perhaps sometime in the future we should consider
> refactoring that a little. 

I have thought about that too. 
Perhaps we could move the "static" objects
(like trains, certificates, tokens, phases, maphex etc.) to a subpackage,
e.g. rails.game.objects. 
And the Rounds to e.g. rails.game.rounds,
leaving a mixed bag of managers, Portfolio, exceptions etc.
in the current package.
 
> Also, I'm getting rather tired of dealing with CVS's 
> bone-headed design.
> I know Sourceforge has other RCSes available (e.g. 
> subversion). I should
> probably investigate if migrating to a modern RCS would make 
> our lives a
> little easier.
 
I am not familiar with the differences.
So far CVS looks good enough to me, but I'm
probably unaware of what goodies we are missing.

For SVN we would need an Eclipse plugin, Subclipse seems to be the way to
go.
 
Erik.