Re: [Rails-devel] Rails 2.0 release next weekend?

[Chris S. <chr...@gm...>]

As long as it is clear that there is a default and it's easy to switch to
the other versions/options, it doesn't much matter. Creating a game takes
what, about 2 minutes? When you consider the entire investment of playing
the game, that isn't a lot. Forcing people to change a game setup option
because the default isn't the version they want to play is not a big deal.

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:14 PM Stefan Frey <ste...@we...> wrote:

> John David Galt asked to change it to the published auction variant.
>
> I will stick to that change as I agree with John that in general the
> rules as published should be the default.
>
> A related question is how to handle rule changes from new releases: For
> example the up-coming 1844/1854 will deviate from the previous versions.
> Rails should support the old and the new release. However what should be
> the default?
>
> On 09/23/2015 10:31 PM, John David Galt wrote:
> > On 2015-09-23 13:22, Schnell, Volker wrote:
> >> in 1835 the Clemens-Variant is not the default.
> >
> > I like it that way.
> >
> > For what it's worth, I haven't had time to test 2.0rc1 yet.
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog!
> > Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools
> > in one place.
> > SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now!
> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rails-devel mailing list
> > Rai...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Rails-devel mailing list
> Rai...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel
>