From: <da...@mi...> - 2015-08-22 14:03:45
|
I have long since given up on the notion that Games Designers/ Rules Writers can write in their native tongue as concisely as we must program. Dave. On 2015-08-22 08:09, Erik Vos wrote: >> -----Original Message----- From: John David Galt [mailto:jd...@di...] > >> Eyal may also sell 10%. In this case he just places his 20% non-president certificate in the bank pool and takes a 10% certificate. > > Apparently you follow the line, that 1835 players buy certificates and sell > shares, both understood as referring to the current common sense meaning of > the words certificate and share. > > I don't believe that the (old) rules as written follow this strict > distinction. In some places, the English rules seem to support your view, in > other places I find it pretty clear that the word 'share' should actually be > understood as 'certificate'. > The word 'certificate' as used in the English rules only seems to occur in > contexts where minors and privates are included as well. > > The German rules (found on BGG) state in 2.6.3.2: > "Jedes "Papier" kann nur als Ganzes verkauft werden, nicht teilweise (z.B. > durch den Austausch einer 20%-Aktie durch einen 10%-Anteil)." > " Each certificate can only be sold as a whole, not in parts (e.g. by > swapping a 20% share for a 10% share)." > > That seems pretty clear to me. If Rails would ever support your way, it > should in my opinion be a non-default game option. > > Erik > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel [1] Links: ------ [1] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel |