From: Stefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2014-08-21 14:16:07
|
Martin: I did take a short glance on your code, however I have seen nothing related to freight trains. Maybe you have not pushed your changes? I would not assume that a new OR Action is required, more like adding new possibilities to the existing one. Yes I agree the activity is very similar to the 1853 revenue and payout problem. I have thought about that previously and it is definite a two-dimensional problem, so the player in the general case (in 1837 at least for a major that can access more than one mine) should be able to choose between different optimization results. (E.g. one maximum run is 320 revenue and 60 from mines, another is 300 revenue, however 80 from mines). So I would present the player a list of possible results and having him/her choose from it. For sure, the results of the run are shown already graphically and as a list of hexes, so this is available. Stefan On 08/19/2014 05:37 PM, Dr. Martin Brumm wrote: > Hello Stefan, > > i think my approach to the freight train problem in 1837 by adding > another OR Action might be overkill at least for 1837, but anyway might > be needed for 1853... But thats another story that time might tell. > > Question to the Master of the network revenue code :); > > Do we get a list of vistited maphexes (vertices) by each train ? So that > one could add a step to the Payout and add the value of a visited coal > mine again to the company specific payout ? > > Regards, > Martin > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > |