Re: [Rails-devel] [Rails-users] 1880 Foreign Investor bug (v.1.8.2)

[Stefan F. <ste...@we...>]

Martin,
if you give me a list of the open issues for revenue calculation in 1880 
and send me save files for those occasions, I will fix those.

However I thought Michael already addressed 1880 specifics of
revenue calculation?

And please tell me which of the branches is used for latest developments 
of 1880, for me to start with.

Stefan


On 10/28/2013 08:58 PM, Martin Brumm wrote:
> Hi Antero,
>
> your last point most likely will be the explanation. But i'll check. The
> rails revenue calculation code has not really been updated for 1880. Its
> a complex piece of code. So we most likely will have to wait for its
> creator to adapt that. Until that happens, player will have to check the
> calculation themselves and take the revenue displayed as a guidance only.
>
> Regards
> Martin
>
> On 28.10.2013 20:42, Antero Kuusi wrote:
>> Actually, looking at the move file, the error seems to be something else
>> and not of wrong train being used. Foreign Investor 6 had ran correctly
>> before that move and it does say that Foreign Investor 7 has a 2+2 train to
>> use. However, it still doesn't count the small station to the north of the
>> starting location by default. Perhaps some trouble with ending the run in a
>> small station and/or the fact that the hex had a medium station originally?
>>
>>
>> 2013/10/28 Antero Kuusi <ak...@ik...>
>>
>>> Here's a save file examples of the situation just before (Ville) and just
>>> after (Atte) the move.
>>>
>>> Antero
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/10/28 Martin Brumm <dr....@t-...>
>>>
>>>> Am 28.10.2013 14:37, schrieb Antero Kuusi:
>>>>> We noticed that the train selection for foreign investors does not
>>>>> work correctly in all of the situations. Specifically, when the last
>>>>> 2T has been bought, but the first 2+2T has not yet been bought, Rails
>>>>> uses 2Ts for the foreign investors.
>>>>>
>>>>> The correct thing would be to use next available train, ie. 2+2T in
>>>>> that situation, but without causing a phase change.
>>>>>
>>>>> We have not tested with the other type changes, but I assume it is the
>>>>> same.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> HI Antero,
>>>> do you guys have a save file available that you could send to me ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>