Re: [Rails-users] Fw: 1856PTK-OR3b> Paul CA & RAILS "bug"

[Ken S. <dr...@ho...>]

I think the algorithm is called the human brain ver 1. If a programmer is to take every possibility into consideration, development will take forever. If one already knows a move is illegal, you wouldn't make it even though the program 'allows' it.  Rails is pretty good as is - what is needed are fully playable versions of 1870, 1880, 1861, and 1817 :) 

Ken Soo
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:40:01 -0800
From: twa...@ya...
Subject: Re: [Rails-users] Fw: 1856PTK-OR3b> Paul CA & RAILS "bug"
To: ali...@gm...
CC: rai...@li...; dr...@ho...; zi...@ju...; pau...@gm...; twa...@ya...

Aliza, the RAILS program must have an algorithm/code that "projects" possible (?) tile-lays; this needs to be refined so that it only works with accessible current track-tiles that can be upgraded, or accessible current (dead-end?) track-tiles that can be extended. -TWHJr


        From: Aliza Panitz <ali...@gm...>
 To: "thomas wall hannaford, jr." <twa...@ya...> 
Cc: "rai...@li..."
 <rai...@li...>; Ken Soo <dr...@ho...>; Paul A Zieske <zi...@ju...>; Paul Zieske <pau...@gm...> 
 Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 6:44 AM
 Subject: Re: [Rails-users] Fw: 1856PTK-OR3b> Paul CA & RAILS "bug"
   

Rails has never claimed to enforce track-laying rules. 

On Thursday, February 28, 2013, thomas wall hannaford, jr.  wrote:

Attention RAILS programmers; note the "bug" that I've detected regarding a 'CA' potential upgrade tile-lay suggested by the program.


      ----- Forwarded Message -----

  From: "thomas wall hannaford, jr." <twa...@ya...>
 To: "zi...@ju..." <zi...@ju...>; "dr...@ho..." <dr...@ho...> 

Cc: "pau...@gm..." <pau...@gm...>; T Wall HannafordJr <twa...@ya...> 

 Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 11:01 PM
 Subject: Re: 1856PTK-OR3b> Paul CA
   

in OR3b Tom operates the 'GW' (it greens London, withholds $140, takes out a 4th loan [net $60], buys a 2nd T3, and buys-in the 'TCC' Private for $100 -still has $90 in its Treasury); it looks like the 'CA' will beat the 'LPS' into London.


Paul, although RAILS shows the 'CA' could green that gentle curve yellow city port (that is to the east of all those whistlestops), that is not legal in '1856' RAW -you need to be able to run a Train on the new track, and the 'CA' still won't connect to that
 upgraded city.

It's now Paul's 'CA' since Keng withheld the 'LPS' in OR3a (maybe Paul was stunned that the 'LPS' withheld in OR3a -he may suffer a TKO with the 'GW' also withholding to start OR3b [let's see if the 'CA' and 'LPS' also withhold in OR3b). -TWHJr


      
  From: "zi...@ju..." <zi...@ju...>

 To: dr...@ho... 
Cc: twa...@ya...; pau...@gm... 

 Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:10 PM
 Subject: RE: 1856PTK-OR3b> Tom GW
   

Tom up

---------- Original Message ----------
From: Ken Soo <dr...@ho...>
To: "zi...@ju..." <zi...@ju...>, "thomas wall hannaford, jr." <twa...@ya...>

Cc: Paul Zieske <pau...@gm...>
Subject: RE: 1856PTK-OR3a> WTF, Dumping???
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:25:51 -0600


Can't speak of the charlatan running the GW, but if I dump the LPS on you, you should fall on your knees and thank God for his bounty.


Ken Soo


 
 From: zi...@ju...
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:44:43 +0000
To: twa...@ya...

CC:
 twa...@ya...; pau...@gm...; dr...@ho...

Subject: Re: Fw: 1856PTK-OR3a> WTF, Dumping???

do you promise not to dump the GW on me if I own more than 1 share? Hah, dumping a company on another person can work really well in 1856 too - for example, you have 4 shares and someone else 2, company has 6 loans - you sell your 4 shares, and the new president is either forced to buy shares of it or is forced to pay off 4 loans when it operates.  plus you can use your money for something else, and not have to trade 2 for 1 government shares...


---------- Original Message ----------
From: "thomas wall hannaford, jr." <twa...@ya...>

To: "zi...@ju..." <zi...@ju...>,  T Wall HannafordJr <twa...@ya...>

Cc: "pau...@gm..." <pau...@gm...>,  "dr...@ho..."
 <dr...@ho...>
Subject: Re: Fw: 1856PTK-OR3a> WTF, Dumping???
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:53:59 -0800 (PST)



Seriously, what are you talking about? In '1856' you get bailed-out by putting Railroads into the Government........
 
BTW, Keng, do you want to get a 'LPS' token in London or not? Think about it, then let me know.....-TWHJr
 
From: "zi...@ju..." <zi...@ju...>

To: twa...@ya... 
Cc: twa...@ya...; pau...@gm...; dr...@ho... 

Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: 1856PTK-OR3a> Keng LPS

paying out better than the CA, and can't dump on me...


---------- Original Message ----------
From: "thomas wall hannaford, jr." <twa...@ya...>
To: "zi...@ju..." <zi...@ju...>,  T Wall HannafordJr <twa...@ya...>

Cc: "pau...@gm..." <pau...@gm...>,  "dr...@ho..."
 <dr...@ho...>
Subject: Re: Fw: 1856PTK-OR3a> Keng LPS
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:06:08 -0800 (PST)


in OR3a the 'GW' lays a straight yellow city, takes out a 3rd loan, pays $30 interest, runs for $100, and buys a T3 for $225; it's Keng's 'LPS'.
 
Note that Keng owns 60% 'LPS'; Paul owns 40% 'CA', 10% each 'LPS' & 'GW' (why?); Tom owns 40% 'GW' & 10% 'LPS'. -TWHJr 
From: "zi...@ju..." <zi...@ju...>

To: twa...@ya... 
Cc: pau...@gm...; dr...@ho...; twa...@ya... 

Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: 1856PTK-OR3a> Tom GW

Tom's GW up.


---------- Original Message ----------
From: "thomas wall hannaford, jr." <twa...@ya...>
To: Paul A Zieske <zi...@ju...>, Paul Zieske <pau...@gm...>,  Ken Soo <dr...@ho...>

Cc: T Wall HannafordJr
 <twa...@ya...>
Subject: Fw: 1856PTK-SR3> Paul2
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:06:48 -0800 (PST)


Tom2 passes; Keng2 is passing? Maybe it's back to Paul2? -TWHJr
 
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "zi...@ju..." <zi...@ju...>

To: dr...@ho... 
Cc: twa...@ya... 

Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:06 PM
Subject: RE: 1856PTK-SR3> Tom2

Paul buys a GW.






____________________________________________________________
Woman is 53 But Looks 25

Mom reveals 1 simple wrinkle trick that has angered doctors...
ConsumerLifestyleMag.com