Re: [Rails-devel] Rails2.0: Money and Bank (was: Rails2.0: Further Changes)

[Erik V. <eri...@xs...>]

> You should not judge the proposal so much on its implementation, but on
> its outcome: If done correctly ...

Its implementation bears upon efficiency, and IMO that what is at stake
here.
 
> This especially allows a symmetric behavior that if you buy e.g. a Train
> from the IPO you can pay to the IPO. 

Yes. I do not put that into question.

> So for the main use cases it behaves like one wallet, it is only the
> internal wiring which uses three wallets.

Accepting all your previous reasoning, I still don't see why  the IPO and
Pool wallets cannot be (or point to) the same object as the Bank's wallet.
The split still seems completely unnecessary to me.
If it is an inevitable consequence of your architecture, then too bad for
that architecture.

But let's stop arguing. 

Erik.