From: Erik V. <eri...@xs...> - 2012-09-02 20:30:09
|
> However it might make the code easier to assume that IPO/Pool etc. have > their own cash wallet to make the item buying code easier: > Then the counterparty of the item transaction is identical to the counterparty > of the accompanying cash transaction. To me, that sounds like making life more complicated rather than making it simpler. Why then not have the Bank portfolios contain a reference to the Bank Wallet? Or indeed, include into every Portfolio a reference to its owner's Wallet. Erik. |