From: Erik V. <eri...@xs...> - 2012-06-17 10:28:54
|
No. I suppose the bank size report has somehow moved downwards, until after player money has been distributed. Moving it back would be more logical, and probably fix this problem as well. > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Frey [mailto:ste...@we...] > Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 12:07 PM > To: Development list for Rails: an 18xx game > Subject: [Rails-devel] Bank size at start in game report > > Erik: > just starting a game for testing I realized that the game reports shows > > > (**)Game is 1830. > > Player 1 is T1. > > Player 2 is T2. > > Player 3 is T3. > > Each player receives $800 from the Bank. > > The Bank has $9600. > > Start of phase 2. > > Bank size is $9600 > > ================ Start of initial round ================ > > T1 has the Priority Deal > > Is there any reason that the Bank size is reported to be identical to the > amount in the bank instead of the total bank size? > > Stefan > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat > landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will > include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel |