From: Stefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2012-06-11 17:47:22
|
Maybe we have discussed that before (Pfalz is always a trouble maker if it comes to rules), but I could not find that exact issue: A) Rules: Is there a general consent of 1835 players what the condition is that the Pfalzbahn closes? The German rules on boardgamegeek (this is the 2nd German edition rules) state under 3.1.3.3 that the Pfalzbahn closes after laying the free token. The English rules on boardgamegeek (this is the 2nd English translation of the 1st German edition rules) state in section II that the Pfalzbahn closes as soon as both actions as been carried out. Now it is important for the 1st edition/English rules interpretation if a tile laying action of a player who does not own the Pfalzbahn is enough to fit the condition stated above. If so the two conditions are identical, if we assume that the tile has to be laid before a token can be laid. However interestingly the rules state that the Pfalzbahn owner is allowed to "... lay a station marker onto this hex". This could be read as it might even be possible to lay a token before the green tile is laid. B) Current Implementation: Rails currently requires both special properties to be taken before the Pfalzbahn closes. If another player lays the tile the token lay property is not activated and the token lay alone does not activate the closing condition. C) Possible Solutions: It is easy to add a <CloseManually/> tag to the Pfalzbahn xml definition, in this case it is possible to close the Pfalzbahn manually, similar to the OBB. This is also a quick-workaround and does not change the action-set, thus is reload-compatible. If all agree that the token lay alone closes the Pfalzbahn (as in the 2nd edition German rules, which have no English equivalent as far as I know), then it would be possible to implement a solution that it is possible to define a SpecialProperty which after activation closes the private company. So far it is only possible for multiple-power privates that either all or any closes the private. However such a change could prevent reloading existing 1835 games. On 06/10/2012 10:19 PM, John David Galt wrote: > The BY just used the Pfalz to place a token, which is supposed to close the > Pfalz but didn't. (The BA laid its own home tile.) > > Perhaps a "close private" menu option is called for as in 1856. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel |