Re: [Rails-devel] Update of the logging framework

[brett l. <bre...@gm...>]

Stefan -

I don't object to it outright, but I would like to see more info on
why such a change is being made before it's implemented.

What limitations of log4j would we be overcoming?
What essential features does sl4j and logback have that log4j doesn't?
Would updating log4j change the comparison any?

I'm not really tied to one solution over another, but I'd like to
understand what we're gaining or losing by switching.

---Brett.


On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Stefan Frey <ste...@we...> wrote:
> Erik & Brett:
> taking the opportunity of a major update to Rails 2.0 I suggest to
> replace the log4j logging by the combination of sl4j and logback.
>
> See http://slf4j.org/ and http://logback.qos.ch/index.html for details.
>
> Any objections?
>
> Stefan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Rails-devel mailing list
> Rai...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel