From: Chris S. <chr...@gm...> - 2012-04-02 01:03:06
|
This is a more global discussion than just 1835. The question is whether to show net worth for a presumed "reasonable expectation of what will happen and when the game will end" or to show the net worth "if the game ended right now." Any game with disappearing privates that have value during existence will be affected, but other scenarios are also affected. I recommend if you decide to display the former, you give players an option to also calculate and view the figures for the latter. -- Chris Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 11:36 AM, John David Galt < jd...@di...> wrote: > On 2012-04-01 04:59, Erik Vos wrote: > >> I found an issue about the worth-calcualtion in Rails for the > >> 1835-Variant. > >> Maybe the Pru shares counts double. > > > Thanks for catching this bug, and for pointing me in exactly the right > > direction for a solution. > > > > The PR is unique in that the market price corresponds to *two* (5%) share > > units. This fact was overlooked in the worth calculation. > > I have pushed a fix to the master branch. > > I have another small issue with the net worth calculation for 1835: LD is > shown at face value, even though it will quickly disappear for nothing. > (This makes that player appear to have a large negative income in the round > when SX floats.) I recommend counting it as zero. Likewise the B&O > private > and those like it in other games. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF email is sponsosred by: > Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > |