Re: [Rails-users] [Rails-devel] BugFix Release for Rails 1880 Alpha5 available - still buggy?

[Chris S. <chr...@gm...>]

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Dr....@t-... <
Dr....@t-...> wrote:

> The rules state the following:
>
>
>
> The number of Building Permits is dependent on the Director's Certificate.
> If this is a
> 40% share, the Building Permit is for 1 Phase.
> 30% share, the Building Permit is for 2 Phases.
> 20% share, the Building Permit is for 3 Phases.
> - The Director has a free choice over which Phases.
>
>
>
> One could now argue that the phrase "is for" makes it mandatory for a
> director to select a 3 Phase Permit. I took the next statement to be the
> indication that a director might choose some other building right.
> (Perhaps i should recode that based on the logical assumption that no
> director
>
> will want to forfeit a possible building phase ? -Opinions here ?)
>

My opinion is that it is illegal for a director of a 20% company to choose
a 1 or 2 phase certificate.  I believe that "is for" mandates the specific
size of the certificate.  The "free choice" is the choice between ABC or
BCD in the case of the 20% certificate.

--
Chris

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.