Re: [Rails-devel] 1880 Implementation: Opinions wanted

[Erik V. <eri...@xs...>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frederick Weld [mailto:fre...@go...]
> Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 5:13 PM
> To: Development list for Rails: an 18xx game
> Subject: Re: [Rails-devel] 1880 Implementation: Opinions wanted
> 
> @Martin & Erik:
> When reading this thread, I'm wondering how you will merge all these
> changes to the game engine into 2.0.
> Perhaps I'm missing some important information here, but as far as I know,
> all changes to game engine will be dropped when migrating to 2.0.

>From my POV, that's up to Stefan.  My current position is, that I'm only
feeling responsible for 1.x.  If and when that will change, I can't say
right now.

Erik.
 
> @Stefan:
> Wouldn't it make sense if master was merged right now into 2.0 and, from
> that point in time on, everyone who changes master is responsible for also
> keeping 2.0 up-to-date? (still keeping two separate branches, of course,
for
> retaining a working version ) That would have the benefit that everyone
can
> directly perceive whether his changes will be valid in 2.0 (and, if not,
how to
> adjust).
> If only merging once 2.0 is ready, we will have to deal with incompatible
> commits that were performed several months ago the
> content/interdependencies of which have long been forgotten...
> At least for me, I would prefer double-maintenance now to that situation
in
> the near future.
> 
> --Frederick
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
> The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is
> just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro
> Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
> _______________________________________________
> Rails-devel mailing list
> Rai...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel