Re: [Rails-devel] Rails 2.0 OperationRound Status & other RoundClasses

[Stefan F. <ste...@we...>]

Hi Martin,
good question: However I cannot and will not commit any date for this. 
The nice thing about the project here is that you do not work with time 
pressure, the bad thing is that it does not have the same priority as those 
from real life which have a schedule assigned.

To give a current guess in the best case it can be 2 months time, but it could 
also take 4 months, before Rounds will be implemented and stabilized.

I have recently update the Rails 2.0 package and you will realize that I have 
no even really started on breaking up the Round classes, as I still focus on 
the State/Model classes, but I expect that to finish soon. This will require 
some more testing and working to get stabilized again. 

Then I will start working on breaking up and redesigning the Round classes, so 
this should start in maybe a month or so.

As the developer of 1870 I am waiting for this to happen for two years now ;-)

Stefan


On Monday, January 02, 2012 01:20:44 pm Dr....@t-... wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> 	since i am currently fiddling in 1880 with some of those Classes
> (Stock-/Start-/OperatingRound) i would love to know when you expect to
> have a useable Class for crosschecks/refactoring the needed additions
> for 1880 in rails 2.0.
> 
>  >> Regarding incompatibility with Rails 2.0 (@Stefan):
>  >> Which aspect of this patch is incompatible to rails 2.0? Which
>  >> adjustment would be necessary in order to avert this?
>  >
>  >The incompatibility is narrowly defined in the sense that the
> 
> commit/patch
> 
>  >cannot be merged automatically with the Rails 2.0 patch:
>  >All patches that include a change GameManager or any of the Round
> 
> classes
> 
>  >cannot be merged automatically anymore.
>  >
>  >It does not mean that it incompatible in a broader sense, it is only
> 
> that
> 
>  >someone has to do the merge manually at some time in the future. And
> 
> as you
> 
>  >are already implement faster as I can currently comment on, it is
> 
> unlikely
> 
>  >that I will be able to that ;-)
> 
>  Btw, Happy new Year to ye all.  Regards Martin