From: Erik V. <eri...@xs...> - 2011-07-28 07:49:41
|
I already have implemented the way John wants it. This version also serves Martin, as he only has to ignore the option that he doesn't want (and it's not at the top of the list). If really hard-pressed, I could be convinced to add a game option to disable it, but that would sound a bit of overkill to me. Erik. > -----Original Message----- > From: John David Galt [mailto:jd...@di...] > Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 3:25 AM > To: Development list for Rails: an 18xx game > Subject: Re: [Rails-devel] Emergency train purchases-1835 > > On 2011-07-27 09:55, Chris Shaffer wrote: > > I think this is a reasonable interpretation - but it's just that, an > > interpretation. I think the other possibilities are also reasonable > > interpretations. Like Erik (and also the people in the 2005 > > discussion), I think this issue is unresolved because of a lack of > > definition of terminology. > > I'm not surprised. Let's support both versions, then. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. > Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. > Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel |