From: brett l. <bre...@gm...> - 2011-07-24 16:03:51
|
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 7:08 AM, John A. Tamplin <ja...@ja...> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Erik Vos <eri...@xs...> wrote: >> >> ‘Rietveld’ seems to be intended for SVN projects. A similar tool exists >> for Git named ‘Gerrit’. Egit supports it. > > Yes, sorry -- I forgot that it needs the repository to be svn. We have > people using it with git, and the upload code understands git clients > (whether from svn or our internal repository which is mirrored to svn). > >> >> I don’t have an opinion right now on whether or not we need such a tool. >> Sounds to me a bit like overkill, but I may be wrong. > > If you spend any time at all looking at patches, you will prefer to look at > them in something like Rietveld. Even if you never want to do > review-before-commit, it is just more convenient to see them there. I think if we had a larger population of patch submissions or more stringent patch submission requirements (e.g. N number of upvotes before acceptance), it might be worthwhile. Right now, I agree with Erik. It's probably overkill for the size of project we are. > -- > John A. Tamplin > ----Brett. |