Re: [Rails-devel] Are we ready for Git?

[Phil D. <de...@gm...>]

As far as I'm concerned it's really Brett, Erik and Stefan's decision
being the primary contributors to the project.  IntelliJ has a Git
plugin so I'm sure I'll work it out :)

Phil

On 11 July 2011 06:04, Stefan Frey <ste...@we...> wrote:
> Erik & Brett,
> given that you both had some long-time hands-on-experience with Maven
> (compared to my third-party recommendation and a short try-out) I agree to
> stay with the current setup.
> I had not tested EGit/JGit before, thus I considered them as competing
> products similar to the svn-support in eclipse ;-)
> Stefan
>
> On Sunday, July 10, 2011 07:08:05 pm brett lentz wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Erik Vos <eri...@xs...> wrote:
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Stefan Frey [mailto:ste...@we...]
>> >> Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 2:42 PM
>> >> To: Development list for Rails: an 18xx game
>> >> Subject: Re: [Rails-devel] Are we ready for Git?
>> >>
>> >> Erik & Brett,
>> >> I am up for that move. Do you recommend JGit or Egit?
>> >
>> > AFAIK you need both (in Eclipse).
>>
>> Correct.
>>
>> JGit is the java git implementation.
>> EGit is the eclipse plugin built on top of JGit.
>>
>> >> I am wondering if you would consider to move to a maven  build at the
>> >> same time. Ideally by changing to the maven recommended repo layout.
>> >
>> > Dunno. Brett is handling the builds (I only run either from Eclipse Run
>> > or from the published Rails jars).
>> >
>> > I hardly know anything about Maven. In the past I have been half-involved
>> > with some (old) projects that used Maven, and perhaps some other stuff.
>> > What I remember about these projects was the ubiquitous presence of
>> > pom.xml files that did not mean anything to me (I wasn't really
>> > interested either - it worked). So I'm blank.
>>
>> I deal with Maven at my day job, and I'm not a fan. Perhaps as Maven 3
>> matures, it will improve in crucial areas. Right now, I really dislike
>> the way it handles dependency resolution, among other things.
>>
>> > Perhaps we'll better restrict ourselves to one major step at a time?
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> > One thing on our Git repo that I have struggled with yesterday is that it
>> > seems to require that the .git directory would exist at the same level as
>> > all project directories (game, tile, data etc.).  I was trying to get
>> > these directories below a src directory on the same level as .git (under
>> > the project root), but failed  to get there. Not really a problem, but
>> > perhaps noteworthy.
>> >
>> > Erik.
>>
>> ---Brett.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously
>> valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance,
>> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data
>> and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rails-devel mailing list
>> Rai...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Rails-devel mailing list
> Rai...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel
>