Re: [Rails-devel] Running to and through stations

[Stefan F. <ste...@we...>]

Brett,
so what is your suggestion exactly?

Mine was:
City (on the map, tokenable) => HexStation
Station (on tile only) => Station

I understood Erik's to be:
City => Stop
Station => Station

I can live with that, however for me it is now improvement compared to the 
previous solution.
But this still keeps Station.

Maybe your a merger of the two:
City => HexStop or MapStop
Station => Stop or TileStop

Stefan


On Thursday, July 07, 2011 06:49:53 pm brett lentz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Erik Vos <eri...@xs...> wrote:
> >> A. City vs. HexStation:
> > I find myself increasingly using the term "train stop".  So, what about
> > Stop or TrainStop?  Very descriptive, and (as you know) I love short
> > type names. Also Stop has no confusing connotations, as City and Station
> > have.
> > 
> > Erik.
> 
> +1 from me. I like "Stop" a bit better, too. It maps closer to the
> logical function of those features on the hex.
> 
> We can use "City" and "Station" as user-visible tags, if we want, but
> to keep the internal data organization sane, I'd like to deprecate
> those terms.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously
> valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance,
> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data
> and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Rails-devel mailing list
> Rai...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel