From: brett l. <bre...@gm...> - 2011-03-15 15:07:53
|
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Bill Rosgen <ro...@gm...> wrote: > Hello, > > Is anyone working on implementing 1848? If not, I would like to start the process. I'm aware that this will require some Java code to enforce the special rules (which I'm prepared to attempt to write). As far as I'm aware, nobody is working on 1848. 18VA, 18GA, 1825, and 1856 have been the most recently talked about games. I think you're the first to mention 1848. > > Does anyone know Double-O objects to the implementation of their games in rails (if no one knows, I'll ask, but I'd hate to pester them if they have a well-known stance)? > We've had no direct contact with them that I'm aware of. It's certainly appreciated if we obtain their blessing, but that might be complicated by any contracts they already have. So far, we haven't been actively contacting game designers outside of the 18xx mailing list, but we do have a standing policy to remove game support if we receive any word from the designer or publisher that we've infringed. > Bill Rosgen ---Brett. |