Re: [Rails-devel] Unofficial game modifications

[Gmail <de...@gm...>]

I think we already have the 1889 2 player variant built in? I'm all for keeping them in, most of these are just simple XML switches which are very easy to add and don't take away from the existing games.



On 13 Mar 2011, at 21:31, Rick Westerman <wes...@pu...> wrote:

>   What should be done in regards to unofficial game modifications.   In particular I am wondering about modifications to allow 2-player play.  My buddy John and myself have been having lots of fun lately doing 2-player 1889, 2-player 18AL, 2-player 1851, etc.  But for the latter two I've had to add a 2-player option in the XML files via extrapolating starting cash and ending certificates.  These modifications are "unofficial" since the designer/publisher of the game did not create them nor have they been published anyway (as the 1830 Coalfields variant was).  On the other hand I think that it would be nice to keep the variants within the Rails eco-system. But the rest of you might not agree. Any opinions on this?
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rick 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
> A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
> for your organization - today and in the future.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Rails-devel mailing list
> Rai...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel