From: John A. T. <ja...@ja...> - 2011-02-17 23:19:53
|
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Erik Vos <eri...@xs...> wrote: > The upgrade chart in my copy of the 1889 rules (version 1.0c) doesn't > specify #39 as a valid upgrade for #28 and #29. Is that an error? > Yes. -- John A. Tamplin |