From: Erik V. <eri...@xs...> - 2011-02-17 22:43:53
|
The upgrade chart in my copy of the 1889 rules (version 1.0c) doesn't specify #39 as a valid upgrade for #28 and #29. Is that an error? Erik. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Justin Rebelo [mailto:jus...@gm...] > Verzonden: donderdag 17 februari 2011 22:58 > Aan: Development list for Rails: an 18xx game > Onderwerp: Re: [Rails-devel] Possible 1889 tile promotion bug > > Stefan, if you load this up you should find that hex F5 demonstrates the bug. > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Justin Rebelo <jus...@gm...> > wrote: > > Oh, I actually had assumed that rails wasn't enforcing those types of > > rules in any game. I will have a look and see if that's it. > > > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Stefan Filonardi <jk...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hello Justin, > >> > >> Am 17.02.2011 21:39, schrieb Justin Rebelo: > >>> I found in 1.4.1 during an 1889 game that I was unable to upgrade a > >>> tile that seems like a perfectly legal upgrade. It was either a tile > >>> #28 or #29 which should upgrade to a #39 but this was not offered as > >>> an option. I imagine this is a really simple thing for developers to > >>> verify, but if you need a save file, I can provide one. > >> > >> Are you sure that the problem is not Rule 6.2 "Upgrading Tiles"? > >> ".... at least one new track on the new tile must form part of a > >> legal route of the company ...." > >> > >> There is only one new track part going from 28/29 to 39. > >> > >> If you are coming from the "united" part of the track, the new track > >> isn't automatically part of a legal route for the building company. > >> > >> Hoping to not have added confusion, > >> ciao stefan > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> --------- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) > >> Parallel Studio XE: > >> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > >> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > >> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. > >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Rails-devel mailing list > >> Rai...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > >> > > |