Re: [Rails-devel] Possible 1889 tile promotion bug

[Justin R. <jus...@gm...>]

Stefan, if you load this up you should find that hex F5 demonstrates the bug.

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Justin Rebelo <jus...@gm...> wrote:
> Oh, I actually had assumed that rails wasn't enforcing those types of
> rules in any game. I will have a look and see if that's it.
>
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Stefan Filonardi <jk...@gm...> wrote:
>> Hello Justin,
>>
>> Am 17.02.2011 21:39, schrieb Justin Rebelo:
>>> I found in 1.4.1 during an 1889 game that I was unable to upgrade
>>> a tile that seems like a perfectly legal upgrade. It was either a
>>> tile #28 or #29 which should upgrade to a #39 but this was not
>>> offered as an option. I imagine this is a really simple thing for
>>> developers to verify, but if you need a save file, I can provide
>>> one.
>>
>> Are you sure that the problem is not Rule 6.2 "Upgrading Tiles"?
>> ".... at least one new track on the new tile must form part of a
>> legal route of the company ...."
>>
>> There is only one new track part going from 28/29 to 39.
>>
>> If you are coming from the "united" part of the track, the new track
>> isn't automatically part of a legal route for the building company.
>>
>> Hoping to not have added confusion,
>> ciao stefan
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
>> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
>> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
>> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rails-devel mailing list
>> Rai...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel
>>
>