Re: [Rails-devel] Possible 1889 tile promotion bug

[Justin R. <jus...@gm...>]

Oh, I actually had assumed that rails wasn't enforcing those types of
rules in any game. I will have a look and see if that's it.

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Stefan Filonardi <jk...@gm...> wrote:
> Hello Justin,
>
> Am 17.02.2011 21:39, schrieb Justin Rebelo:
>> I found in 1.4.1 during an 1889 game that I was unable to upgrade
>> a tile that seems like a perfectly legal upgrade. It was either a
>> tile #28 or #29 which should upgrade to a #39 but this was not
>> offered as an option. I imagine this is a really simple thing for
>> developers to verify, but if you need a save file, I can provide
>> one.
>
> Are you sure that the problem is not Rule 6.2 "Upgrading Tiles"?
> ".... at least one new track on the new tile must form part of a
> legal route of the company ...."
>
> There is only one new track part going from 28/29 to 39.
>
> If you are coming from the "united" part of the track, the new track
> isn't automatically part of a legal route for the building company.
>
> Hoping to not have added confusion,
> ciao stefan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
> _______________________________________________
> Rails-devel mailing list
> Rai...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel
>