From: NetGamer <net...@tw...> - 2010-07-16 23:54:46
|
I filed this bug. Phil hit the nail on the head - I didn't catch there being a drop down to allow selecting more than one share to put in the pool at once and was expecting to be able to repeat the action - as desired. To the other point that was raised around the net impact being the same: 1851 ruleset is a bit different but is intended to be more friendly to new players. Selling off a treasury share one at a time during one's operating round would be in the spirit of the design - more friendly. -Ron Phil Davies wrote: > I don't believe there is a general consensus among all players but I > would like to think that the prevailing opinion is that in games where > selling a 'block' of shares causes a price drop, you cannot sell 1, > then sell 1, then sell 1 without passing in between and allowing other > people to react. If you specifically want to sell to drop the price > and are happy to take the hit then you have to sell, let the other > players have a turn each to react, then sell again. > > Now, this refers to stock round actions and 1851 where a company is > selling/buying is an operating round action. It's not clear from the > rules I agree but the way we always play these games face to face is > that each company gets one 'transaction', that is either sell or buy, > and if you can do as many certs as you like in that transaction. We > mostly apply this to EU. > > This is only really an issue when you drop one row per block, that > doesn't happen in 1851, so despite the fact that the 'correct' way of > doing it would be to just choose to sell all the shares you want in > the first transaction, someone could theoretically sell 1, sell 1, > sell 1 and it won't make any difference to the gamestate than selling > 3 in one transaction, so in this case it should be allowed (despite > the fact that the user could just click 'undo' then sell the correct > number of shares as a faster way of doing it. I'm just trying to > think of what makes a more pleasant user experience, they shouldn't > really be left confused because they didn't spot the dropdown box on > the sell screen > > Phil > > On 15 July 2010 22:49, Stefan Frey <ste...@we...> wrote: > >> A current open bug report for 1851: >> >>> When I try to sell a second company share during that company's operating >>> round, Rails says I can't sell after buying. This appears to be >>> inconsistent with the rules. >>> >> refers to the fact that it is not possible to sell other shares from the >> Treasury after a first sell transaction (and the error message is confusing). >> >> Question is, similar to the discussion we had previously on selling in >> separate transactions but same player turn in 1835, 1830 and 1870: >> >> Should the second transaction use the initial price at the start of the >> players turn (thus identical to the one used for the first transaction) or >> the reduced price taking the the stock market reaction into account? >> >> I have not found a ruling in 1851, thus I am inclined to follow the current >> standard implementation in Rails (identical to the first transaction), >> however - if I remember correctly - there was no general consensus for this >> (at least for 1830). >> >> Stefan >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint >> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? >> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails-devel mailing list >> Rai...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint > What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? > Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > > |