From: Erik V. <eri...@xs...> - 2010-06-25 20:39:55
|
I consider it an immaterial difference in rules wording, that does not merit complicating the UI. But apparently opinions differ. I won't oppose such a change, but I have better things to spend my time on. Erik. _____ From: Chris Shaffer [mailto:chr...@gm...] Sent: Friday 25 June 2010 22:22 To: Development list for Rails: an 18xx game Subject: Re: [Rails-devel] 18EU minor initial sale round bugs [EV] Indeed. I don't actually see why "Pass" would not cover "Decline to bid" as well. I don't see any need to make that distinction. It is problematic to explain rules when the interface does not match the terminology in the rules. "Pass" has a specific meaning that is different from "decline to bid." I'm not sure why there would be resistance to having Rails match the game rules? What good reason could there be for desiring a conflict in terminology? -- Chris |