From: Stefan F. (web.de) <ste...@we...> - 2010-06-21 21:37:50
|
Starting to get an overview about the usage of ids versus types to identify interchangable objects I realized that there is a bug still lingering in the wild: For a train exchange the id of the train exchanged was not saved, as it used the train(type) name instead of the unique id. Unfortunately this was not working. I fixed that now, however: I suspect, that (at least in version 1.3) all games with a train exchange cannot be loaded beyond that point. At least a save file from my latest play of 1889 supports my assumption. And I hope that there is no case where trains are selected by train type instead of train ids, as this could imply that a train which is somewhere else already gets exchanged (given an unfortunate sequence of undos). Question to Erik: There was even a TODO comment inside the BuyTrain action: trainsForExchangeUniqueIds[i] = trains.get(i).getName(); // TODO: Must be replaced by unique Ids It was not the important line (that is the one which defines the exchangedTrainUniqueId variable). But still any reason why you have used getName() at the time of implementation? Stefan |