Re: [Rails-devel] Implementation details for revenue calculation

[Stefan F. <ste...@we...>]

Phil:
in my area (routing and revenue calculation) 1856 is the game I hardly tested. 
If I am not wrong, it has no unique features, thus everything should work 
fine, but that is a "should", thus tests would be very welcome there.
1835 should work ok in that respect.
Stefan


On Tuesday 25 May 2010 09:02:30 Phil Davies wrote:
> I'll probably be starting another game from source this week to test
> the impact on other games, is '35 at the stage where it would be
> worthwhile getting some testing feedback?  I was thinking of trying
> that out on my regulars.
>
> On 24 May 2010 12:48, Erik Vos <eri...@xs...> wrote:
> > 18EU Bankruptcy now seems to work correctly, and is open for testing for
> > whoever is interested in this feature and can compile from the sources.
> > In particular, more testing is needed for side effects on other games, as
> > the processes of starting and closing companies has changed somewhat. The
> > visibility of companies in GameStatus and ORPanel was the last main
> > issue.
> >
> > Undo is getting better, but doesn't yet seem work completely.
> >
> > More later this week.
> >
> > Erik.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stefan Frey [mailto:ste...@we...]
> > Sent: Monday 24 May 2010 10:00
> > To: Development list for Rails: an 18xx game
> > Subject: Re: [Rails-devel] Implementation details for revenue calculation
> >
> > Erik & Brett,
> > currently quite occupied with other tasks I am only adding small bits in
> > an incremental way. I think 1.3.0 is appropriate with a new game
> > supported and the first step to revenue and route support.
> >
> > I have added the support (or better removal) of the Birmingham tile
> > before phase 4 by defining an according NetworkGraphModifier interface,
> > which allows
> > to adjust the network graph immediately after creation. Changes defined
> > by this interface also effect the highlighting for tile and token lays.
> >
> > This implies that all titles should be supported, but I am sure there is
> > still
> > something is missing, especially for those games which I only know from
> > the rulebook.
> >
> > The fix of the 18EU bankruptcy should allow to close the bug 2954661.
> > Game End undos are already possible (I fixed that in 1.2).
> > Do you think it will be possible to provide an undo possibility for the
> > bankruptcy in 18EU as well?
> >
> > Stefan
> >
> > On Friday 21 May 2010 22:10:41 Erik Vos wrote:
> >> Next weekend sounds good. In view of all the great stuff added by
> >> Stefan,
> >
> > a
> >
> >> minor release (1.3.0) might be appropriate?
> >>
> >> By now the bugs list is pretty empty; in the past few weeks I have fixed
> >> quite a lot.
> >>
> >> I'm working on the 18EU bankruptcy rules, which were missing. I hope to
> >
> > get
> >
> >> that done this weekend, but I'm currently much distracted by other
> >> activities, so progress is slow. Right now, 18EU hangs in case of a
> >> bankruptcy, but I would't consider that a show-stopper; to my knowledge
> >> bankruptcies are rare in 18EU.
> >>
> >> I have added comments to the 1835 description on a few remaining issues,
> >> with workarounds, but otherwise I think it's about done. I have marked
> >
> > 1835
> >
> >> "almost playable".
> >>
> >> Erik.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: brett lentz [mailto:bre...@gm...]
> >> Sent: Friday 21 May 2010 18:55
> >> To: Development list for Rails: an 18xx game
> >> Subject: Re: [Rails-devel] Implementation details for revenue
> >> calculation
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Stefan Frey <ste...@we...> wrote:
> >> > Again some more update:
> >> >
> >> > Full support for 18AL and 18EU is in, 1851 has only Birmingham
> >> > missing. More details see below.
> >> >
> >> > As Brett and Erik keep quiet about their preference for a release
> >> > soon,
> >
> > I
> >
> >> kept
> >>
> >> > adding functionality.
> >>
> >> Excellent work.
> >>
> >> As for when to do a new release, a lot of it is down to how stable
> >> your changes are.  It sounds like we may be nearing a point where we
> >> are ready for a new release.
> >>
> >> How does next weekend sound?
> >>
> >> ---Brett.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >--
> >
> >>- --
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Rails-devel mailing list
> >> Rai...@li...
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >--
> >
> >>---
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Rails-devel mailing list
> >> Rai...@li...
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >--- --
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rails-devel mailing list
> > Rai...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >-----
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rails-devel mailing list
> > Rai...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>---
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rails-devel mailing list
> Rai...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel