Re: [Rails-devel] Implementation details for revenue calculation

[Stefan F. <ste...@we...>]

yes that helps, otherwise it would not be scored. The same is true for the 
equivalent tile in 1856.

The (additional) virtual vertex takes care of the bonus condition to end the 
run at the off-board location and is thus only required for 18EU.

On Wednesday 28 April 2010 21:41:08 Erik Vos wrote:
> Would it help if I changed the tile description in Tiles.xml accordingly?
> (i.e. as you say: "a non-tokenable station in the middle of the hex")
>
> Erik.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Frey (web.de) [mailto:ste...@we...]
> Sent: Wednesday 28 April 2010 00:37
> To: Development list for Rails: an 18xx game
> Subject: [Rails-devel] Implementation details for revenue calculation
>
> 4) 18EU
>
> Hamburg: I have to admit that I do not like the Hamburg offboard tile: The
> graphical representation does not define exactly, where the value vertex
> is,
>
> as it does not contain any type of station.
> I assume the most natural interpretation is to assume a non-tokenable
> station
> in the middle of the hex (similar to tile 12, only that the slot cannot be
> filled). To work with the offboard bonuses, an additional vertex is
> connected
> to the station vertex, which acts as a sink (has no neighbors defined, thus
> similar to a tokened out station). All of the bonus combinations for
> Hamburg
>
> use that vertex to enforce the restriction that the bonus runs have to stop
> in Hamburg. (D)
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--- _______________________________________________
> Rails-devel mailing list
> Rai...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel