From: Stefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2010-04-17 15:03:59
|
Aliza, this reminds me of the suggested changes of the implemention levels as discussed some time ago for the next release. It seems to come close to what you have in mind. So far the opinions for the individual 18xx were: 1825: D 1830: B/A 1835: D 1851: B 1856: 1870: D 1889: B 18AL: B 18EU: C/B With A=mature, B=fully playable, C=almost playable, D=experimental. (See definitions below) There has not been any comment on the level of 1856 with respect to the scaling above. And keep in mind that even if the individual 18xx might be stable, Rails itself is still not feature complete, thus even stable 18xx might be impacted from time to time. Stefan A) Mature - Several independent plays until the end reported - Full implementation of the ruleset - All possible moves are available - No illegal move possible (except tile and token lays, revenue calculation) => Serious ftf play possible => pbem play possible B) Fully Playable - Full implementation of the ruleset - All possible moves are available - Might still allow a few illegal moves (in addition to tile and token lays, revenue calculation) => Serious ftf play possible, but bugs are possible => use with caution for pbem play, version incompatibilities possible C) Almost Playable - Nearly complete implementation of the ruleset - Not all possible moves are available - Illegal moves are possible => Serious testing possible, do not expect to complete a game => not recommended for pbem play D) Experimental - Rules and components are incomplete => Some testing possible On Friday 16 April 2010 22:25:41 Aliza Panitz wrote: > Is there going to be a Rails release with this bug fix in it? (We're > trying to decide how/whether to continue the game this bug was > reported on...) > > 1856 has been marked as "fully supported" since Rails 1.0.7 and I'm > still struggling to complete PbEM games I started in November... > perhaps there should be another game status, "first release" or > "playtesting needed" or something, to denote games that are mostly > complete but for which there has been no extensive playtesting. > > - Aliza > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Erik Vos <eri...@xs...> wrote: > > Never mind, I could reproduce the problem as described below, and have > > fixed it. > > Can’t upload it now (SVN seems down) so that will be done tomorrow. > > > > Erik. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Erik Vos [mailto:eri...@xs...] > > Sent: Friday 26 March 2010 00:00 > > To: 'Development list for Rails: an 18xx game'; 'Aliza Panitz' > > Subject: Re: [Rails-devel] 1856: CGR Bug: selling 5% moves stock price > > > > Ah, you mean that sales of 15% and 5% have added up? > > If that is what has happened, I think I know what has caused this. > > A saved file would of course help a lot... > > > > Erik. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joshua Gottesman [mailto:jos...@gm...] > > Sent: Thursday 25 March 2010 22:56 > > To: Aliza Panitz > > Cc: Development list for Rails: an 18xx game > > Subject: Re: [Rails-devel] 1856: CGR Bug: selling 5% moves stock price > > > > Yeah, I didn't even notice that. I just expected it to keep the price > > the same. I suspect what happened is it counted your 15% and held the > > 1/2 share and then combined that with my 1/2 share for another price > > drop. Which is incorrect. > > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Aliza Panitz <ali...@gm...> > > > > wrote: > >> Rails 1.2.2 bug: > >> > >> Selling a single 5% share of the CGR to the pool should not have > >> changed the stock > >> price. > >> > >> To quote the rules: > >> > >> ============== > >> The share value tokens move: > >> > >> Down one row for each full 10% share sold either during a stock round > >> or during a forced sale by a company president. The sale of a single > >> 5% share does not affect the share value token. Sales of multiple 5% > >> shares move the share value token > >> ============== > >> > >> To quote the game report: > >> ] Joshua sells a 5% share of CGR to Pool for $90. > >> ] CGR price goes from $90(E2) to $80(E3). > >> > >> > >> I'll file an official bug later if nobody else gets to it first. > >> > >> - Aliza > >> > >> 2010/3/25 Joshua Gottesman <jos...@gm...>: > >> - Hide quoted text - > >> > >>> ================== > >>> Start of Stock Round 6 > >>> ================== > >>> Aliza has the Priority Deal > >>> > >>> Aliza sells 3 5% shares (15%) of CGR to Pool for $300. > >>> CGR price goes from $100(E1) to $90(E2). > >>> Aliza starts GT at $100 and pays $200 for 2 shares (20%) to Bank > >>> Joshua sells a 5% share of CGR to Pool for $90. > >>> CGR price goes from $90(E2) to $80(E3). > >>> Joshua starts TGB at $100 and pays $200 for 2 shares (20%) to Bank > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >--- -- > > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > > _______________________________________________ > > Rails-devel mailing list > > Rai...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >--- -- > > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > > _______________________________________________ > > Rails-devel mailing list > > Rai...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >----- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > > _______________________________________________ > > Rails-devel mailing list > > Rai...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >--- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel |