From: Chris B. <bro...@co...> - 2010-02-03 23:09:32
|
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:34 PM, brett lentz <wak...@gm...> wrote: > That's actually what we do at $dayjob. We have a central git > repository server that everyone pushes their changes into. We don't > publish our personal repositories for merging our various development > trees. We can, we just don't. For our use case, it just wouldn't > help us any. > My experience is the same as yours Brett, and I'm a big fan of git. It takes a while to "get git" but once you do the model is very compelling. And having the easy *option* to commit/share/branch peer-to-peer without a central server can be very handy in circumstances where you need it. -Chris |