From: brett l. <wak...@gm...> - 2009-11-04 06:47:38
|
Fixed. Looks like Sourceforge made some changes to the way they classify the files we distribute. We're categorized as a Java app. The .zip and .tar.bz2 aren't immediately recognizable as Java. It looks like it just defaulted to the last file we uploaded that was obviously Java, which was the 1.0.2 jar file. I've set the 1.0.6 files to suggest the appropriate file for the OS each client is using (.zip for windows and mac, .tar.bz2 for all others). ---Brett. On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:10 PM, brett lentz <wak...@gm...> wrote: > Good question. I'll look into it. > > ---Brett. > > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Chris Shaffer <chr...@gm...> wrote: >> On this page: >> >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/rails/ >> >> why is the big green link to version 1.02? >> >> -- >> Chris >> >> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day >> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus >> on >> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails-devel mailing list >> Rai...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel >> >> > |