From: Rainer M. <rai...@we...> - 2007-01-19 19:20:31
|
> > > >Perhaps it is all worth a try. > > > I have just checkout rails and use the default .project. Don'nt = know=20 > > > if it comes with Rails or is the Eclipse default one. But class = and > > > java are in > > > the same dir and that is quit confusing for me. > > > > I think that is a difference between Brett's and my setup: > > I have created subfolders named src and bin for the sources and=20 > > classes, respectively, and I think Brett is using the Eclipse = default. > > > This is true. I don't change many of Eclipse's defaults. So you checkout into src and move the files for the higher folder up? OK - that will work for a while. > > My main problem was how to get the resources and XMLs in the=20 > > classpath, but somehow I managed. > > > > I'm getting the feeling that you know a lot better how to set up = such=20 > > a project than Brett (sorry if I'm wrong, Brett!) and certainly than = > > me, and I'm absolutely interested to see a proper one.... > > > No apology needed. This is true, this is my first real development project. > > I know that there are many things that most software projects do that we're not doing. I'd love to move toward a more=20 > standardized setup. However, I'd like to see all of the steps involved = and make better plans to do it in a way that=20 > doesn't disrupt our ability to still work on the code itself. > ... (from other mail) > Rainer - I think this is the core problem I'm having with many of = these suggestions.=20 > Instead of learning how we've been >>working, and doing it our way for = a while,=20 > you're suggesting a lot of large, drastic changes to accomodate your = own preferences. > > I think that we should focus more on reaching our existing goals. =20 > So far, I haven't received a patch for the first item you brought up = (the disclaimer)=20 > and now you're moving on to suggesting changing our RCS and moving all = of our files around=20 > and reworking large portions of our architecture. Thanks - I'm working as 'software-project-leader' now for about 15 = Years, Writing code for about 30 Years, with UI as a main field for about 20 = Years. And thats maybe my problem. It's right. You start the project and have = made allmost all coding yet. I'm the new one in the project and should follow you're project style. But if I see somethink, that I do not like, I will tell you. I make offers, who you can make it better and tell you the drawbacks. Thats all. I would not have bring up the discussion about = project layout if this project is under SubVersion or if I have knew that the history is not verry valueable for you.=20 Doing thinks step by step is much better!=20 Every project layout change will hold the project at least for the = hours, you are doing it. As long as there are only a view people working on it, that has no impact on the project. As I said yesterday. I can give you a view on maven project layout on = rails or go on with the coding my fist changes on UI - starting sequence and disclaimer. I like both thinks (both thinks will get me more familar = with your code) and you have the choice. So I will do coding tomorrow. By the way: Everey time a get a new developer in my team, I have the = same problem as you have with me :-) Rainer |