Re: [Rails-devel] rails-package rails.ui.swing SVG revenue

[brett l. <wak...@gm...>]

On 1/19/07, Erik Vos <eri...@hc...> wrote:
>
> IMHO the package name changes (prepending 'rails.')
> is worth doing now, better than later.
> I don't care about the loss of history, as I'm sure
> that the current version is better than anything in the past.
> In any case I will make a backup copy of my current project.
>


Agreed. This is small, and our revision history isn't a major loss. I
can't really see us reverting too far back. Plus, we do have a couple
of old released versions. I think that's good enough.


> The changes to Subversion and the project structure
> clearly need more thought and can be postponed, if done at all.
>

I honestly don't see the merit. It's a big upheaval for a very minor
gain. Plus, the gain is only realized in certain cases.


> However, I leave the decision to Brett.
> One of us should do it, as only the two of us can commit code now.
> I'm prepared to do the package name changes next Sunday,
> but it's equally fine to me drop the whole issue.
>

I think we should move toward a more standard package naming structure.

I might have time this weekend to do it. If not, it can happen next weekend.

---Brett