From: Erik V. <eri...@hc...> - 2007-01-16 23:20:09
|
Hi Rainer, BTW I am redirecting this post to the mailing list as it contains items of general interest. Here comes my first, very little patch: A new main class with which you can start rails with arguments (Example: RailsMain 1830 - p1 p2 p3 p4). Well, GameTest was of course a temporary name anyway. By the way: I would prefer a main parent package, where all other packages are children from. SUN guidelines tells about a location.company.package structure. Normally rails would be org.rails.*, but I think rails.* would be enough for now. If you have discussed this before and did'nt want it, I will refactore the swing package to root. We have not discussed this before, and I like the idea of putting rails in front of all package names. I have used swing as a package name instead of UI, because maybe someone else would like to make a SWT-UI or a JSP-UI. In that case I would propose rails.ui.swing. I reckon that at some point we will need separate classes for ui-related (or client-side) logic that is common to all possible UI implementations, such as the code that interfaces with the back-end Round instances. Such classes could then be in rails.ui. Erik. Second maybe I have to transfer your UI-Components to my UI-Components part by part. With my own package, I can use both classes at the same time and do not have to use different class names for the same thing. Hope you like it Regards Rainer |