Re: [Rails-devel] Rails-devel Digest, Vol 2, Issue 1

[brett l. <wak...@gm...>]

On 7/1/06, John A. Tamplin <ja...@ja...> wrote:
> brett lentz wrote:
>
> >I agree.  I think we could do 1870 and maybe even 1856 without too
> >much trouble or worrying about deeper consequences.
> >
> >
> If you want games that are closer, there are a number of "1830 on a
> different map" games which would require fewer additions than either of
> these.  1889, 1899, 18NL, 18KAAS, 18AL, 18GA, 18TN and others would fit
> in this category.
>

All those will work.  Do you have time to work on the XML data for those?


> >Let's hold off on 18EU until we can do a complete implementation of the game.
> >
> >Ok, so let's prioritize things like this:
> >
> >1. Undo - this seems to be the most important and desired feature.
> >2. 1870 - because it's very close to 1830. Other than the privates and
> >splitting revenue we've already got almost all of the rules
> >differences, so I expect this will be quick to get fully working.
> >
> >
> Share price protection (and the resulting order shuffling), redeeming,
> and reissuing are all implemented?
>

Nope, those are the things we'd need to implement.

> >3. Save Games - while this is important, due to the relative ease of
> >playing a full game in a single sitting, I think we can push this off
> >a little bit.
> >
> >
> I would say route calculation should probably go before this, although
> depending on how #1 is done this may come almost for free.
>

We were waiting on route calculation for someone (you?) to port their
tile data over.



---Brett.