Re: [Rails-devel] Rails-devel Digest, Vol 2, Issue 1

[John A. T. <ja...@ja...>]

brett lentz wrote:

>I agree.  I think we could do 1870 and maybe even 1856 without too
>much trouble or worrying about deeper consequences.
>  
>
If you want games that are closer, there are a number of "1830 on a 
different map" games which would require fewer additions than either of 
these.  1889, 1899, 18NL, 18KAAS, 18AL, 18GA, 18TN and others would fit 
in this category.

>Let's hold off on 18EU until we can do a complete implementation of the game.
>
>Ok, so let's prioritize things like this:
>
>1. Undo - this seems to be the most important and desired feature.
>2. 1870 - because it's very close to 1830. Other than the privates and
>splitting revenue we've already got almost all of the rules
>differences, so I expect this will be quick to get fully working.
>  
>
Share price protection (and the resulting order shuffling), redeeming, 
and reissuing are all implemented?

>3. Save Games - while this is important, due to the relative ease of
>playing a full game in a single sitting, I think we can push this off
>a little bit.
>  
>
I would say route calculation should probably go before this, although 
depending on how #1 is done this may come almost for free.

-- 
John A. Tamplin					ja...@ja...
770/436-5387 HOME				4116 Manson Ave
                		 		Smyrna, GA  30082-3723