From: Erik V. <eri...@hc...> - 2005-11-21 20:54:53
|
> Brett Lentz wrote: > > Is there any type of Token that isn't directly related to a Company? > > The only one I can think of are the alpine-mountain tokens in > 18EU (which mean > that it will cost money to play the second tile in each of > those hexes, even > though the tiles aren't any different than those in > non-mountain locations). Yes, I thought about these tokens too, but I don't think we need to represent these with separate objects here. As other people have stressed, we should display the upgrade cost anyhow. I would propose to implement such upgrade costs internally as an array (index = upgrade level). XML config for such hexes could be like cost="120" for the standard case, cost="120,60" for 18EU, Upgrade cost tokens also exist in 1849 Sicily, where the same fixed cost must be paid for *every* upgrade. We could represent that with cost="160,*" (also "40,*" and "80,*"), but there is a complication that the cost is different for narrow gauge: 25% of that for normal gauge (this is the incentive to build such gauge at all). Perhaps we'll have to create a special for this case! Erik. |