From: Brett <wak...@ea...> - 2005-04-23 18:02:21
|
On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 16:00 +0200, Erik Vos wrote: > My proposal would be to create an interface (tentatively named Auction) > which defines the following method sets: I haven't played many of these games enough to know the auction structure very well, so I'll need to defer most of this to you and anyone else that wishes to contribute. > Questions: > 1. Does this make sense? Yes. This is the right way to go, IMO. > 3. Is anybody able to define not-overly-long descriptive class names > for all these varieties? If not, I would simply call them AuctionLike1830, > AuctionLike1841 etc. You could simply go with Auction1830 or 1830Auction and omit the 'Like'. That seems adequate to me. ---Brett. A conference is a gathering of important people who singly can do nothing but together can decide that nothing can be done. -- Fred Allen |