From: brett l. <wak...@gm...> - 2009-01-03 01:48:24
|
It probably sounds strange because I probably didn't explain it very well. ;-) SF.net provides us (me) with admin tools that behave like a CMS (plone, drupal, joomla, etc.). So, to publish a release, I "create a release" which basically just creates a blank entry in their database for me to associate with any files, release notes, etc. that I upload. So, it's this "release" object in their database that has a creation timestamp independent of the files' own timestamps. The web UI is just displaying the timestamp on this "release" database object rather than hitting the file system to look up when the individual files were last modified. ---Brett. On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Mark Smith <mar...@gm...> wrote: > That sounds strange... but I tried it out. It does appear to run properly > under Java 1.5. Looking at the JAR file itself, it does show a modified date > of January 2, 2008 at 2:32 PM. > > Mark > > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 6:38 PM, brett lentz <wak...@gm...> wrote: >> >> The date is probably the date I created the "release" tag in the CMS, >> and probably has no bearing on the date the files were uploaded. >> >> Bug or feature, you decide. ;-) >> >> ---Brett. >> >> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Mark Smith <mar...@gm...> wrote: >> > Brett, >> > >> > I went to look and just confirm it ran ok. What I find at the download >> > location is Version 1.0.6 from Dec 22, 2008. This appears with the same >> > timestamp as the previous tarball. >> > >> > Mark >> > >> > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 3:22 PM, brett lentz <wak...@gm...> wrote: >> >> >> >> I've released a fixed version of 1.0.6 that works on Java 5 (1.5). >> >> >> >> The new changes will need to wait for another release. >> >> >> >> ---Brett. >> >> >> >> >> >> 2008/12/26 Mark Smith <mar...@gm...>: >> >> > You could generate a separate deployment package aimed at Java 1.5... >> >> > or >> >> > simply update the Version Number to 1.0.7, with the bug fixes Erik >> >> > has >> >> > put >> >> > in. >> >> > >> >> > Mark >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 1:14 PM, brett lentz <wak...@gm...> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Yep. It looks like my copy of Eclipse was set to compliance level >> >> >> for >> >> >> Java >> >> >> 1.6. >> >> >> >> >> >> I'll fix that and release an updated package. >> >> >> >> >> >> ---Brett. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Mark Smith <mar...@gm...> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > Brett & Erik, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I have duplicated the problem on my Mac OS 10.5 running Java 1.5. >> >> >> > The >> >> >> > code >> >> >> > runs properly on Java 1.5, and I expect maybe you upgraded your >> >> >> > Eclipse >> >> >> > to >> >> >> > generate for Java 1.6 and that won't run on a Java Platform with >> >> >> > 1.5. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > The latest version of Java for Mac that is available is Java SE 6 >> >> >> > for >> >> >> > Mac >> >> >> > OSX 10.5.2 and later. One of the key items though is that it will >> >> >> > only >> >> >> > work >> >> >> > in 64 bit Intel based Macs, not PowerPC or 32 bit Intel based >> >> >> > Macs. >> >> >> > So >> >> >> > unless there is a very compelling reason to compile it as Java >> >> >> > 1.6, I >> >> >> > recommend that you do not do so. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Mark >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Mark Smith >> >> >> > <mar...@gm...> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Given I do my development on my Mac, OS 10.5, I will look into >> >> >> >> this >> >> >> >> this >> >> >> >> evening. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Mark >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Erik Vos <eri...@hc...> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> Brett, >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> The "Compiler compliance level" in my Eclipse Rails project is >> >> >> >>> set >> >> >> >>> to >> >> >> >>> 5.0, >> >> >> >>> and it compiles and runs with JRE 1.5.0_11, so I would be >> >> >> >>> surprised >> >> >> >>> is >> >> >> >>> the >> >> >> >>> code is at 6.0 somewhere. Could you please check your versions, >> >> >> >>> as >> >> >> >>> used >> >> >> >>> in >> >> >> >>> building the release? >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> I would prefer to leave the level at 5.0 for another while. (BTW >> >> >> >>> I >> >> >> >>> don't >> >> >> >>> think 6.0 has produced any significant new stuff on the code >> >> >> >>> level, >> >> >> >>> so >> >> >> >>> I >> >> >> >>> suspect it'll rather be the JRE). >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> Erik. >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >> >> >> >>> From: brett lentz [mailto:wak...@gm...] >> >> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday 24 December 2008 04:58 >> >> >> >>> To: bro...@gm...; Development list for Rails: an 18xx game >> >> >> >>> Subject: Re: [Rails-devel] Running 1.0.6 on Mac OS X 10.5 >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> Can you try using Java 6 (1.6.0)? Maybe some 6-specific code >> >> >> >>> crept >> >> >> >>> in... >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> ---Brett >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Chris Brooks >> >> >> >>> <bro...@gm...> >> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> > I'm able to run 1.0.5 just fine, but when I try to run 1.0.6 >> >> >> >>> > no >> >> >> >>> > joy. >> >> >> >>> > Some details: >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > java version "1.5.0_16" >> >> >> >>> > Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build >> >> >> >>> > 1.5.0_16-b06-284) >> >> >> >>> > Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_16-133, mixed mode, >> >> >> >>> > sharing) >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > The error I see: >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > Exception in thread "main" >> >> >> >>> > java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: >> >> >> >>> > Bad >> >> >> >>> > version number in .class file >> >> >> >>> > at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) >> >> >> >>> > at >> >> >> >>> > java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:675) >> >> >> >>> > at >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:124) >> >> >> >>> > at >> >> >> >>> > java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:260) >> >> >> >>> > at >> >> >> >>> > java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100(URLClassLoader.java:56) >> >> >> >>> > at >> >> >> >>> > java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:195) >> >> >> >>> > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native >> >> >> >>> > Method) >> >> >> >>> > at >> >> >> >>> > java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188) >> >> >> >>> > at >> >> >> >>> > java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:316) >> >> >> >>> > at >> >> >> >>> > sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:280) >> >> >> >>> > at >> >> >> >>> > java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:251) >> >> >> >>> > at >> >> >> >>> > java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:374) >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > Any ideas? >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > -Chris >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails-devel mailing list >> Rai...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > > |