Re: [Rails-devel] Another Bug I have found, and worked out a fix for

[Jean M. (Europe) <Jea...@eu...>]

Hi Mark, Erik, everyone,
 
Just a small note to say I have followed the discussion, and without any
pretention to say I understand the gritty details, Erik says that the
classes in question are being instantiated "dynamically", e.g. in a way
such that constructors would be inappropriate.  So he says he would be
happier to leave the empty constructors and use the setGameManager() or
any other configuration method.
 
Erik, would you be so kind as pointing out very pragmatically to one
specific such case?  I think it might enlighten at least myself on the
way the architecture has been thought out and built.  This would have
all of us looking into the same direction (or question the direction,
but this would certainly not come from me).
 
Thank you,
 
Jean (John in French) Michalski


________________________________

	From: Mark Smith [mailto:mar...@gm...] 
	Sent: 05 December 2008 23:43
	To: Development list for Rails: an 18xx game
	Subject: Re: [Rails-devel] Another Bug I have found, and worked
out a fix for
	
	
	OK, if you feel that parametrized constructors is a step
backwards, I will comply with your request. I don't agree, but I won't
argue about it any more.
	
	Mark